Since 2011, we've helped more than 5 million visitors understand Medicare coverage.

Find Medicare plans that fit your needs.*

Enroll in a plan today.

Medicare Heads Up: December 13, 2019

A round-up of the state and national Medicare news that matters to consumers

Jesse Migneault | December 13, 2019

Welcome to Medicare Heads Up, a regular feature intended to deliver state and national Medicare-related headlines that will keep consumers abreast of developments that affect their coverage and costs. This week:

Consumer advocates raise flags over transparency of Advantage plans

Consumer advocates  – including the American Medical Association – are raising concerns over the accuracy and transparency of Medicare Advantage plans and calling for streamlining of tools that consumers use to compare plans. A recent resolution by the AMA directly calls for protection of “seniors from Medicare Advantage plans,” and cites concerns over transparency in advertising, marketing practices, and the potential for higher lifetime costs for beneficiaries – especially if enrollees fall ill or attempt to leave Medicare Advantage for traditional Medicare. Given the soaring popularity of Advantage plans with the public – boosted by aggressive advertising and enticements such as “free premiums” – enrollment has grown from 5.3 million to over 22 million members since 2004. In 2019, Advantage enrollment comprised 34 percent of all eligible Medicare beneficiaries.

Medicare open enrollment ends with new questions about accuracy of consumer choices

When Medicare open enrollment ended December 7, there were already warnings that consumers may have enrolled in the wrong plans, due to inaccuracies on the revamped CMS Plan Finder website. Although CMS already has methods for enrollees to be eligible for a special enrollment exemption period, the growing backlash against the Plan Finder website has opened the door to a possible extension, although none has been set yet. A CMS statement to Kaiser Health News suggested that beneficiaries would be offered the option to change plans in 2020 if they chose the wrong plan due to Plan Finder misinformation – although no specific instructions or further information on any special accommodations for Plan Finder errors have been outlined yet.

Bill to add dental, vision, and hearing coverage to Medicare passes House

The House of Representatives this week passed legislation expanding Medicare benefits to include dental, vision, and hearing coverage (although the future of the bill is bleak with Senate Republicans opposed and the Trump administration threatening a veto). The addition of expanded Medicare benefits would plug a longtime gap in coverage, particularly for dental care, where preventive services have never been covered. Advocates for dental coverage point to data indicating oral health is integral to overall wellbeing and in preventing the growth of chronic conditions. Currently 65 percent of Medicare beneficiaries have no dental coverage, and barely half visited a dentist in the past year. This is particularly problematic for seniors whose oral health woes (often exacerbated by medication induced dry mouth) can evolve into difficulty eating, and increased emergency room visits for dental related conditions.

Steps you can take if you selected the wrong plan during open enrollment

If you switched your Medicare Advantage coverage during open enrollment and feel that you chose the wrong plan, you may be able to get a “do-over.” The first step is to identify the problem with your plan selection, and locate a replacement plan that meets your needs for premiums, copays and deductibles, in-network providers, and pharmacies. Then, call 1-800-MEDICARE and discuss your situation with a customer service agent. For some enrollees, you can qualify for a special enrollment period if you meet one of the listed CMS criteria. For those who need to change plans due to an issue with the new Plan Finder website, CMS has promised to help beneficiaries who believe they made a wrong selection.

IG report: Advantage plans overcharged beneficiaries by billions in 2017

An Inspector General report found $6.7 billion in overcharges by Medicare Advantage insurance agencies in 2017. The report did not list any insurers specifically, but it did state the overcharges happened when Medicare Advantage beneficiaries were diagnosed with conditions – or upgraded severity of conditions – even though no evidence or treatment of those conditions existed. This included 99.3% of patient charts reporting diabetes, cardiovascular disease and other chronic conditions, without any clinical backup, or a “single record of service to the beneficiary.” The report concludes the need for heightened auditing and scrutiny to ensure reported conditions and procedures match actual clinical services. A response from CMS to the Inspector General’s report concurred with the conclusions of stricter controls, but disagreed with the $6.7 billion as too high.

Wisconsin legislation would allow Medigap switches without underwriting

If approved, a proposed bill in Wisconsin would make it the ninth state to allow Medigap enrollees an opportunity to change to a different Medigap plan, without medical underwriting, after their initial enrollment window ends (the Wisconsin legislation would only allow guaranteed access to a Medigap plan with equal or lesser benefits). For many traditional Medicare beneficiaries, supplemental policies such as Medigap are a lifeline to cover out-of-pocket expenses such as coinsurance and copays. But in 42 states, Medigap applications can be rejected based on medical history after the beneficiary’s initial enrollment period ends, making plan changes unattainable to many consumers.


Jesse Migneault is a journalist and editor who has written about business, government and healthcare – including public and private-payer health insurance. His articles have appeared in HealthPayerIntelligence, the Hartford Courant, Portsmouth Herald, Seacoastonline.com, Foster’s Daily Democrat, and York County Coast Star.

In addition, his work has been cited by health industry stakeholders such as the Eugene S. Farley Health Policy Center, Association of Healthcare Journalists, American Academy of Actuaries, Kaiser Permanente, blueEHR, San Diego Law Review, Medicare Agent News, healthjournalism.org, and Concierge Medicine among others.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Find a plan.
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x