Since 2011, we've helped more than 5 million visitors understand Medicare coverage.

Find Medicare plans that fit your needs.*

Enroll in a plan today.

Medicare Heads Up: June 12, 2020

A round-up of the state and national Medicare news that matters to consumers

Josh Schultz | June 12, 2020

Reviewed by our health policy panel.

Welcome to Medicare Heads Up, a regular feature intended to deliver state and national Medicare-related headlines that will keep consumers abreast of developments that affect their coverage and costs. This week:

More beneficiaries can enroll in Medicare Part B online

The Social Security Administration (SSA) and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) have changed Medicare’s enrollment process to allow more Medicare Part B applications to be submitted online due to the coronavirus. An individual previously had to be applying for both Part A and Part B in order to enroll online, which meant that if they already had Part A but needed Part B, they had to enroll at a Social Security office or submit enrollment forms by mail or fax. (The option to send a fax was also added during the crisis.)

SSA’s new online application for Medicare will accommodate requests from individuals needing to use the Part B Special Enrollment Period (SEP) or who are seeking equitable relief to enroll in Part B. Due to the coronavirus, individuals losing employer-sponsored coverage can use the new application to submit proof of their SEP eligibility based on coverage through a group health plan if an employer is unable to sign Form L564, which is normally used to confirm SEP eligibility (and this form can also be submitted online). Individuals applying for both Part A and Part B should continue to do so using the old enrollment portal.

Medicare beneficiary advocates have asked SSA and CMS to continue using the new online enrollment process for Part B after the coronavirus ends.

Medigap enrollment rises 3.3 percent in 2020

Medigap enrollment in the United States rose by 452,000 people (3.33 percent) from 2018 to 2019, according to data from Mark Farrah Associates.

As of 2020, Medigap Plan F and Plan C are not available to beneficiaries who were newly eligible for Medicare after December 31, 2019. Largely as a result of anticipation of this change, the number of Plan F enrollees decreased by 244,000 from 2018 to 2019. But Plan F was still by far the most popular plan as of 2019, with 6.8 million Plan F enrollees, accounting for nearly half of the total Medigap market (Plan F’s share of the market is expected to decrease in future years, as newly-eligible enrollees cannot select Plan F anymore).

Enrollment in the most comprehensive Medigap plan available to newly eligible Medicare beneficiaries – Plan G – increased by 761,500 new beneficiaries in 2019.

United Healthcare had 32 percent of the Medigap market in 2019, with over 4.5 million policyholders, followed by Mutual of Omaha, which had a 10 percent market share and 1.4 million policies.

Telehealth use increases dramatically due to pandemic

Recently released data from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) show that nearly 1.3 million Medicare beneficiaries had a telehealth visit the week of April 18, 2020, compared to just 11,000 beneficiaries during one week in early March. That dramatic increase followed major expansions of Medicare’s coverage for telehealth, which had been restricted to rural beneficiaries who saw providers in specific settings prior to the coronavirus.

CMS has also expanded the types of services Original Medicare beneficiaries can receive through telehealth, and increased payments to match the amounts paid for in-person care. Providers are lobbying CMS to make these changes permanent once the crisis ends, which will help ensure providers don’t cut back on telehealth services for beneficiaries. CMS Administrator Seema Verma said the agency will still allow additional types of care to be delivered using telehealth, but CMS hasn’t decided whether to continue the payment increases.

Original Medicare will require prior authorization for several procedures starting in July

Medicare beneficiaries will need to confirm their provider has received prior authorization from Original Medicare before they receive certain services at a hospital outpatient department – or their procedure could be delayed. CMS will require prior-authorization for these five categories of services beginning July 1, 2020:

  • blepharoplasty,
  • botulinum toxin injections,
  • panniculectomy,
  • rhinoplasty, and
  • vein ablation

CMS is requiring prior-authorization for these services – which have established medical uses but are sometimes performed for cosmetic reasons – in an effort to limit “unnecessary increases” in the number of these services Medicare covers.

Medicare Advantage and commercial insurers commonly require policyholders to obtain prior-authorization before covering certain services, but until recently, Original Medicare was unable to approve payment for services before they occur. These procedures only require prior-authorization if they’re provided at a hospital outpatient department, which means they don’t need to be prior-authorized if they’re provided by a doctor who practices independently.

National Association of Area Agencies on Aging asks Senate to approve Medicaid funding, programs for vulnerable seniors

The National Association of Area Agencies on Aging sent a letter to Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell and Minority Leader Chuck Schumer asking them to support the Medicaid provisions in the Health and Economic Recovery Omnibus Emergency Solutions (HEROES) Act.

The legislation would increase the federal government’s share of most Medicaid costs by 7.8 percent to help states avoid reducing Medicaid benefits during the recession. The House passed the HEROES Act on May, 15, 2020, but the Senate has declined to consider the legislation.

The HEROES Act would also increase federal reimbursement of Medicaid Home and Community Based Waiver Services (HCBS). More than two-thirds of Area Agencies on Aging help with the provision of Medicaid HCBS, which allows beneficiaries to receive assistance with activities of daily living while continuing to live at home. The association expects more beneficiaries to need these services due to the coronavirus.

The organization’s letter also requests funding for several programs intended to reduce isolation among vulnerable seniors, including $80 million to distribute computers and tablets, and $50 million for programs to help beneficiaries who are homebound due to the coronavirus.

Senior advocates also urge passage of Medicaid funding provisions

The Leadership Council on Aging also sent a letter to the Senate Majority and Minority Leaders on behalf of 34 organizations that advocate for seniors – including the Medicare Rights Center, AARP, AFSCME and SEIU – requesting increased Medicaid funding during the coronavirus crisis.

The organizations asked the Senators to increase the federal government’s reimbursement of states for Medicaid HCBS, among other requests. A total of 820,000 beneficiaries were on waiting lists to receive HCBS prior to the coronavirus (and these waits averaged 39 months). States and the federal government spent a combined $92 billion on Medicaid HCBS in fiscal year 2018 out of Medicaid’s total spending of $169.9 billion on long-term care.

Seniors frequently prefer receiving HCBS to living in a nursing home – but these services are expensive and states are not required to cover them. This is why advocates predict HCBS will be subject to budget cuts during a recession, and are asking Congress to pass the HEROES legislation, which would prohibit states from reducing these benefits during the crisis.

Josh Schultz has a strong background in Medicare and the Affordable Care Act. He coordinated a Medicare ombudsman contract at the Medicare Rights Center in New York City, and represented clients in extensive Medicare claims and appeals. In addition to advocacy work, Josh helped implement federal and state health insurance exchanges at the technology firm hCentive. He also has held consulting roles, including as an associate at Sachs Policy Group, where he worked with insurer, hospital and technology clients on Medicare and Medicaid issues.

Find a plan.
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x